Institutionalizing Evaluation - review of international experience

carol — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:44:33 -0600

Policy-makers are experimenting with billion’s of people’s lives on a daily basis without informed consent, and without rigorous evidence that what they do works, has no substantive adverse effects, and could not be achieved more efficiently through other means. In this context, carefully designed and implemented evaluations have the potential to save lives and improve people’s welfare. However, to date evaluations have tended to be selected based on the availability of data, the interest of researchers and donors, and the availability of funds rather than on their potential contribution to broader development strategies. For this reason, the institutionalization of quality evaluation is necessary in order to turn it into an optimal tool for policy-making. This report looks at the experiences of institutionalizing government evaluation efforts and considers the lessons learnt for countries starting down that road.

This report compares experiences of institutionalizing government evaluation efforts through a discussion of the three leading models in Latin America – Mexico, Colombia and Chile - the non-centralized system of monitoring and evaluation adopted in South Africa, and the policylearning approach taken in China. Some developed country and international experiences are also
briefly presented.

The case of Mexico: the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Policy, CONEVAL
The case of Colombia: the National System for Evaluation and Management for Results, SINERGIA
The case of Chile: the Management Control Division at DIPRES
The Case of South Africa: the Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System
The case of China: the state of current evaluation efforts

Information Provided by Carol Lombard, Department of Social Development Population Website

KM & Social Challenges

The Ibrahim Index of African Governance

storytelling — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:29:00 -0600

The Ibrahim Index of African Governance is a comprehensive ranking of African countries according to governance quality. Funded and led by an African institution, the Ibrahim Index aims to be Africa’s leading assessment of governance that informs and empowers citizens to hold their governments and public institutions to account. Thus it is hoped to stimulate debate in a constructive way and establish a framework for good governance in Africa.

The Ibrahim Index measures the delivery of public goods and services to citizens by government and non-state actors. The Ibrahim Index uses indicators across four main pillars: Safety and Rule of Law; Participation and Human Rights; Sustainable Economic Opportunity; and Human Development as proxies for the quality of the processes and outcomes of governance.

The Ibrahim Index assesses governance against 84 criteria, making it the most comprehensive collection of qualitative and quantitative data that measures governance in Africa. The criteria are divided into four main categories and 13 sub-categories. The indicators that make up the sub-categories are based either on official data (OD) or expert assessment (EA).

The 2009 Ibrahim Index includes new indicators more regularly updated, and therefore more immediately reflective of current reality. The index has also been extended this year to consider the entire continent, not just the sub-Saharan region, following consultation with stakeholders and in consideration of the geographic and political links between all African countries.

In addition, the Ibrahim Index will be compiled in partnership with African academics and researchers. Already, experts from various African institutions including: Afrobarometer, the American University in Cairo, the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA – in Senegal), and the Institut de Recherche Empirique en Economie Politique (IREEP- in Benin) support the Foundation’s research team. These experts sit on the Academic Advisory Council and Technical Committee, whose work is overseen by the Foundation’s Director of Research, Dr Hania Farhan.

We are deeply committed to this partnership with institutions on the continent and to developing capacity within them so that in the years to come they will be full partners in the compilation of the Ibrahim Index. This is part of our commitment to further entrench the continent’s ownership of governance issues and to improve the quality and availability of data.

The lack of sufficiently robust and comprehensive data to assess African progress is striking in all the components of the index. This unavailability of data has led us to exclude a number of indicators, particularly those that assess poverty and vital aspects of health service delivery, which are major issues for developing countries. This is a pragmatic choice and finding strong poverty and health indicators in future years will be a core priority for us.

Mo Ibrahim Foundation and Index Website

KM & Governance